<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t break up the newspaper, make it an online community platform instead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://strangehold.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://strangehold.com/blog/?p=118</link>
	<description>The official website of David George-Cosh</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:34:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Don&#39;t break up the newspaper, make it an online community platform &#8230; &#124; thecommunitysecrets</title>
		<link>http://strangehold.com/blog/?p=118&#038;cpage=1#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Don&#39;t break up the newspaper, make it an online community platform &#8230; &#124; thecommunitysecrets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strangehold.com/blog/?p=118#comment-67</guid>
		<description>[...] View original here: Don&#039;t break up the newspaper, make it an online community platform &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] View original here: Don&#39;t break up the newspaper, make it an online community platform &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Topics about Fashion &#187; Archive &#187; Don’t break up the newspaper, make it an online community platform&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://strangehold.com/blog/?p=118&#038;cpage=1#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Topics about Fashion &#187; Archive &#187; Don’t break up the newspaper, make it an online community platform&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strangehold.com/blog/?p=118#comment-66</guid>
		<description>[...] Diana Napolis, M.A. put an intriguing blog post on Don&#226; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Diana Napolis, M.A. put an intriguing blog post on Don&acirc; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Topics about Pirate-bay &#187; Archive &#187; Don’t break up the newspaper, make it an online community platform&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://strangehold.com/blog/?p=118&#038;cpage=1#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Topics about Pirate-bay &#187; Archive &#187; Don’t break up the newspaper, make it an online community platform&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strangehold.com/blog/?p=118#comment-65</guid>
		<description>[...] Tech News - REALHS added an interesting post today on Don&#226; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tech News &#8211; REALHS added an interesting post today on Don&acirc; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen Gerson</title>
		<link>http://strangehold.com/blog/?p=118&#038;cpage=1#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen Gerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 12:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strangehold.com/blog/?p=118#comment-64</guid>
		<description>David,
That sounds a lot like the HuffPo, whose big problem is that it doesn&#039;t compensate the vast majority of its contributors. For purely selfish reasons, that&#039;s not a model I&#039;m going to advocate for ;)

As for my omission of the business section, you&#039;re absolutely correct. I think most business sections could probably become completely independent titles and charge a lot more for what they produce. The WSJ.com example proves that business is a niche that pays. 

I&#039;m also going to clarify one point on my blog: the template I suggested on that post was only an example. The point is each newspaper would have to gauge its own strengths and readerships and stagger printing schedules and vary costs accordingly. For example, if you were to cut apart the Globe, the business section would probably stand alone and do quite well as a daily section. At the Star, the business section would probably just get canned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,<br />
That sounds a lot like the HuffPo, whose big problem is that it doesn&#8217;t compensate the vast majority of its contributors. For purely selfish reasons, that&#8217;s not a model I&#8217;m going to advocate for <img src='http://strangehold.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>As for my omission of the business section, you&#8217;re absolutely correct. I think most business sections could probably become completely independent titles and charge a lot more for what they produce. The WSJ.com example proves that business is a niche that pays. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m also going to clarify one point on my blog: the template I suggested on that post was only an example. The point is each newspaper would have to gauge its own strengths and readerships and stagger printing schedules and vary costs accordingly. For example, if you were to cut apart the Globe, the business section would probably stand alone and do quite well as a daily section. At the Star, the business section would probably just get canned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
